Artanti, Viska Anindya Apta (2024) TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP DISSENTING OPINION PADA PUTUSAN PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 72/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Mad). S1 thesis, Universitas PGRI Madiun.
![[img]](http://eprint.unipma.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text
Halaman Depan_Viska Anindya A_2006101008-1.pdf Download (1MB) |
|
Text
Abstrak_Viska Anindya_2006101008.pdf Download (9kB) |
|
Text
BAB I_Viska Anindya_2006101008.pdf Download (428kB) |
|
Text
BAB II_Viska Anindya_2006101008.pdf Download (653kB) |
|
Text
BAB III_Viska Anindya_2006101008.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (281kB) |
|
Text
BAB IV_Viska Anindya_2006101008.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (426kB) |
|
Text
BAB V_Viska Anindya_2006101008.pdf Download (184kB) |
|
Text
Daftar Pustaka_Viska Anindya_2006101008.pdf Download (371kB) |
|
Text
Lampiran_Viska Anindya_2006101008.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (2MB) |
Abstract
This research examines the dissenting opinion in the Madiun District Court Decision Case Number 72/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Mad. The study aims to understand the dissenting opinion because, according to the author, there are aspects that need to be discussed regarding the interpretation of the phrase "possessing, storing, controlling, or providing narcotics" in Article 112 of the Narcotics Law. The method used in this research is the normative method. The results of this research are, firstly, in case number 72/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Mad, the element of possessing, storing, controlling, or providing, which was charged to the Defendants, turned out not to belong to the Defendants, as corroborated by the testimonies of Witness Afif Sifaullinas, Witness Hariyanto, and the verbalist witness. Secondly, the basis for the judge's consideration leading to the dissenting opinion is that the Chief Judge views that the Defendants were not legally and convincingly proven to have committed the narcotics crime as per the second alternative indictment of the Public Prosecutor. The application of the dissenting opinion is very important in expressing views that differ from the majority opinion in a case, and plays a crucial role in the development of law.
| Item Type: | Thesis/Skripsi/Tugas Akhir (S1) |
|---|---|
| Kata Kunci: | Putusan, Narkotika, Perbedaan Pendapat |
| Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) |
| Divisions: | Fakultas Hukum > Hukum |
| Depositing User: | APTA ANINDYA VISKA |
| Date Deposited: | 15 Aug 2024 02:01 |
| Last Modified: | 19 Aug 2024 08:14 |
| URI: | http://eprint.unipma.ac.id/id/eprint/1462 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
