ULANSARI, ELLA LUSTIA (2026) PENGARUH GAYA HIDUP HEDONIS, RASA TAKUT TERTINGGAL (FEAR OF MISSING OUT), DAN KONTROL DIRI TERHADAP PENGELOLAAN UANG SAKU MAHASISWA MANAJEMEN UNIVERSITAS PGRI MADIUN. S1 thesis, Universitas PGRI Madiun.
![[img]](https://eprint.unipma.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text
Halaman Depan.pdf Download (344kB) |
|
Text
ABSTRAK.pdf Download (111kB) |
|
Text
BAB 1.pdf Download (114kB) |
|
Text
BAB II.pdf Download (201kB) |
|
Text
BAB III.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (311kB) | Request a copy |
|
Text
BAB IV.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (219kB) | Request a copy |
|
Text
BAB V.pdf Download (17kB) |
|
Text
DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Download (249kB) |
|
Text
LAMPIRAN.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (3MB) | Request a copy |
Abstract
Pocket money management is an aspect of students’ financial behavior that is associated with lifestyle, digital social pressure, and self-control. This study aimed to analyze the partial and simultaneous effects of hedonic lifestyle, fear of missing out (FOMO), and self-control on pocket money management among Management students at Universitas PGRI Madiun. This study employed a quantitative approach with a causal-associative research design. The sample consisted of 305 students selected through proportionate stratified random sampling. Data were collected using a four-point Likert-scale questionnaire and analyzed using SPSS version 24. All questionnaire items were valid, with calculated correlation coefficients ranging from 0.382 to 0.801, exceeding the critical value of 0.112. The instruments were reliable, with Cronbach’s Alpha values of 0.939 for hedonic lifestyle, 0.916 for FOMO, 0.924 for self-control, and 0.937 for pocket money management. The classical assumption tests showed that the residuals were normally distributed, with a significance value of 0.200. The relationships between the variables were linear, with deviation from linearity values of 0.628, 0.748, and 0.056, and no multicollinearity or heteroscedasticity was detected. The results showed that hedonic lifestyle had a positive and significant effect, with a regression coefficient of 0.260 and a significance value of 0.000. FOMO had a negative but insignificant effect, with a coefficient of -0.038 and a significance value of 0.679. Self-control had a positive and significant effect, with a coefficient of 0.435 and a significance value of 0.000. Simultaneously, the three variables had a significant effect, with an F-value of 36.975 and an R Square of 0.269. It is concluded that hedonic lifestyle and self-control significantly affect students’ pocket money management, whereas FOMO does not have a significant effect.
| Item Type: | Thesis/Skripsi/Tugas Akhir (S1) |
|---|---|
| Kata Kunci: | gaya hidup hedonis, FOMO, kontrol diri, pengelolaan uang saku, mahasiswa. hedonistic lifestyle, FOMO, self-control, pocket money management, students. |
| Subjects: | A Social Sciences > HG Finance |
| Divisions: | Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan > Pendidikan Ekonomi |
| Depositing User: | ULANSARI LUSTIA ELLA |
| Date Deposited: | 24 Aug 2026 05:27 |
| Last Modified: | 24 Aug 2026 05:27 |
| URI: | http://eprint.unipma.ac.id/id/eprint/9383 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
