Putri, Febilita Erlinia (2026) PERBANDINGAN UNSUR PASAL 2 DAN PASAL 3 UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 31 TAHUN 1999 jo. UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 20 TAHUN 2001 TENTANG PEMBERANTASAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DALAM PERSPEKTIF PRINSIP KEADILAN DAN PROPORSIONALITAS. S1 thesis, Universitas PGRI Madiun.
![[img]](https://eprint.unipma.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text
HALAMAN DEPAN.pdf Download (806kB) |
|
Text
ABSTRAK.pdf Download (35kB) |
|
Text
BAB I.pdf Download (280kB) |
|
Text
BAB II.pdf Download (629kB) |
|
Text
BAB III.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (118kB) |
|
Text
BAB IV.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (559kB) |
|
Text
BAB V.pdf Download (39kB) |
|
Text
DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Download (243kB) |
|
Text
LAMPIRAN.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (6MB) |
Abstract
The difference in the construction of elements and the potential for overlap in application between Article 2 and Article 3 of Law Number 31 of 1999 jo. Law No. 31 of 2001 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes cause problems in law enforcement, especially related to legal certainty, justice, and proportionality of punishment. This study aims to analyze the comparison of the elements of Article 2 and Article 3 of Law No. 31 of 1999 jo. Law No. 31 of 2001 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes based on the principles of justice and proportionality, as well as their implications for law enforcement. Using normative legal methods with legislative and conceptual, the data was analyzed qualitatively. The results of the study show: first, the two articles have similarities in the elements of the subject of law, the purpose of the state's profits, and losses, but differ in the actus reus (the essence of the act). Article 2 focuses on unlawful acts, while Article 3 focuses on the abuse of office authority. Although the criminal threat is different, the wedges of these two elements have the potential to cause multiple interpretations and overlap in judicial practice. Second, the implications affect the consistency of the investigation, prosecution, and criminal process. Therefore, clarity on the limits of the application of the two articles is needed to ensure legal certainty, justice, and proportionality of punishment in Indonesia.
| Item Type: | Thesis/Skripsi/Tugas Akhir (S1) |
|---|---|
| Kata Kunci: | Corruption Crimes; Article 2; Article 3; Justice; Proportionality Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Pasal 2, Pasal 3, Keadilan, Proporsionalitas Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Pasal 2, Pasal 3, Keadilan, Proporsionalitas |
| Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) |
| Divisions: | Fakultas Hukum > Hukum |
| Depositing User: | PUTRI ERLINIA FEBILITA |
| Date Deposited: | 07 Aug 2026 08:18 |
| Last Modified: | 07 Aug 2026 08:18 |
| URI: | http://eprint.unipma.ac.id/id/eprint/8323 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
